Warm at the north pole
-
- Posts: 145052
- Joined: Thu, Feb 27 2003, 06:38:33 pm
Warm at the north pole
<div id="1486560193"><i>Storm, east of Greenland</i><br><p> <a target="_blank" href="http://mashable.com/2017/02/06/storm-wi ... </a></p><p class="BN"> <img border="0" src="../pub/images/https%20_blueprint-api-production.s3.amazonaws.com_uploads_card_image_373956_508cd610-f63b-4dd6-b227-d973b0eb95b9.jpg" width="500" height="281"></p><p class="BN">An extraordinarily powerful storm system is spinning across the North Atlantic Ocean, just southeast of Greenland. Together with long-term climate change and other transitory weather systems, it is setting the stage for a dramatic and unusual warmup at the North Pole this week.</p><p class="BN">For the third time this winter, such a storm is likely to vault unusually warm air toward the pole, potentially bringing temperatures across the sunless Arctic to near the melting point for a brief period late this week.</p></div>
-
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Tue, Aug 02 2016, 03:54:17 pm
-
- Posts: 1333
- Joined: Wed, Sep 25 2013, 12:16:20 pm
Well it's been colder here in Northern Nevada. The last snow storm
stayed on the ground for 2.5 weeks and just melted two days ago.
This has not happened since 1988.
Coming Ice Age?
SCIENTISTS PREDICT COMING ICE AGE!!
By Hideaki Tailor on January 30, 2012
"According to the world’s top scientists the world hasn’t warmed in 15 years and we are
headed for a new ice age!
Statistics and data suggest we are headed for a new ice age to rival the 70-year temperature
drop that saw frost fairs held on the Thames in the 17th Century.
Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week
without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit.
It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997.
Meanwhile, leading climate scientists said that, after emitting unusually high levels of energy
throughout the 20th Century, the sun is now heading towards a ‘grand minimum’ in its output,
threatening cold summers, bitter winters and a shortening of the season available for growing food.
Solar output goes through 11-year cycles, with high numbers of sunspots seen at their peak.
We are now at what should be the peak of what scientists call ‘Cycle 24’ – which is why last
week’s solar storm resulted in sightings of the aurora borealis further south than usual.
But sunspot numbers are running at less than half those seen during cycle peaks in the
20th Century."
http://weeklyworldnews.com/headlines/43 ... g-ice-age/
Look Davis, your being disagreed with so you might want to lock this up real fast…ðÿ”“
Why does this belong on the front page under HG topic?
Follow your own rules and set a good example.
Otherwise your just going to lose readers or you will be banning those who don't like
your politics..
Pretty soon no one left…
B R
stayed on the ground for 2.5 weeks and just melted two days ago.
This has not happened since 1988.
Coming Ice Age?
SCIENTISTS PREDICT COMING ICE AGE!!
By Hideaki Tailor on January 30, 2012
"According to the world’s top scientists the world hasn’t warmed in 15 years and we are
headed for a new ice age!
Statistics and data suggest we are headed for a new ice age to rival the 70-year temperature
drop that saw frost fairs held on the Thames in the 17th Century.
Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week
without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit.
It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997.
Meanwhile, leading climate scientists said that, after emitting unusually high levels of energy
throughout the 20th Century, the sun is now heading towards a ‘grand minimum’ in its output,
threatening cold summers, bitter winters and a shortening of the season available for growing food.
Solar output goes through 11-year cycles, with high numbers of sunspots seen at their peak.
We are now at what should be the peak of what scientists call ‘Cycle 24’ – which is why last
week’s solar storm resulted in sightings of the aurora borealis further south than usual.
But sunspot numbers are running at less than half those seen during cycle peaks in the
20th Century."
http://weeklyworldnews.com/headlines/43 ... g-ice-age/
Look Davis, your being disagreed with so you might want to lock this up real fast…ðÿ”“
Why does this belong on the front page under HG topic?
Follow your own rules and set a good example.
Otherwise your just going to lose readers or you will be banning those who don't like
your politics..
Pretty soon no one left…
B R
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Tue, Jul 07 2015, 05:03:42 pm
-
- Posts: 1333
- Joined: Wed, Sep 25 2013, 12:16:20 pm
Some people believe politicians know more about science than scientists.
Some people believe scientists know more about politics than politicians.
Since we call the discipline political science which means the "science of politics",
I lean against the later.
Laws and policies are generated from needs based on facts that unmanaged lead
to consequences detrimental to society and individuals.
Things that are detrimental are evidenced by measurements and are repeatable
using the scientific methods.
Therefore science precedes policies and lawmaking.
Policies and lawmaking which precedes science is summed up in this age old quote.
"Hell is paved with good intentions."
However in the case of "climate policies preceding science", the policy makers know
the reasons are not for public good. They are for public control.
The same way gun control is not about guns. It is about people control.
Below is the final say at the heart of climate science reported by scientists.
Many more good articles on this link..
http://www.winningreen.com/site/epage/146555_621.htm
Home > What We Do > Public Articles > Climate Change Reconsidered II:
Physical Scienceemail pageprint page Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science
Winningreen Discourse
Heartland Institute unveils “Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Scienceâ€
By Tom Randall
Date: September 20, 2013
The new gold-standard reference on anthropogenic climate change — rather, the lack thereof —
was introduced at a luncheon conference in the offices of Chicago’s prestigious Heartland Institute
last Wednesday.
The 1200+ page peer-reviewed report, prepared for the Nongovernmental International Panel on
Climate Change by over 40 scientists, soundly refutes the biased scare mongering of the United
Nations’ decades-long misrepresentation of climate science
As the Heartland Institute says on its web site, “The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate
Change (NIPCC) is an international panel of nongovernment scientists and scholars who have come
together to present a comprehensive, authoritative, and realistic assessment of the science and
economics of global warming. Because it is not a government agency, and because its members
are not predisposed to believe climate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, NIPCC
is able to offer an independent “second opinion†of the evidence reviewed – or not reviewed – by the
[UN’s] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the issue of global warming.â€
The study was presented by three of the authors: Dr. Craig D. Idso, Dr. S. Fred Singer and Willie Soon
as well as by Joe Bast, president of The Heartland Institute.
This report should be a standard reference for all policy makers dealing with this generally misrepresented
and misreported issue.
You can get the full report by going to: http://climatechangereconsidered.org/
Contact: Tom Randall
Winningreen LLC
Chicago, IL
Phone: 773-857-5086
e-mail: trandall@winningreen.com
Some people believe scientists know more about politics than politicians.
Since we call the discipline political science which means the "science of politics",
I lean against the later.
Laws and policies are generated from needs based on facts that unmanaged lead
to consequences detrimental to society and individuals.
Things that are detrimental are evidenced by measurements and are repeatable
using the scientific methods.
Therefore science precedes policies and lawmaking.
Policies and lawmaking which precedes science is summed up in this age old quote.
"Hell is paved with good intentions."
However in the case of "climate policies preceding science", the policy makers know
the reasons are not for public good. They are for public control.
The same way gun control is not about guns. It is about people control.
Below is the final say at the heart of climate science reported by scientists.
Many more good articles on this link..
http://www.winningreen.com/site/epage/146555_621.htm
Home > What We Do > Public Articles > Climate Change Reconsidered II:
Physical Scienceemail pageprint page Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science
Winningreen Discourse
Heartland Institute unveils “Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Scienceâ€
By Tom Randall
Date: September 20, 2013
The new gold-standard reference on anthropogenic climate change — rather, the lack thereof —
was introduced at a luncheon conference in the offices of Chicago’s prestigious Heartland Institute
last Wednesday.
The 1200+ page peer-reviewed report, prepared for the Nongovernmental International Panel on
Climate Change by over 40 scientists, soundly refutes the biased scare mongering of the United
Nations’ decades-long misrepresentation of climate science
As the Heartland Institute says on its web site, “The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate
Change (NIPCC) is an international panel of nongovernment scientists and scholars who have come
together to present a comprehensive, authoritative, and realistic assessment of the science and
economics of global warming. Because it is not a government agency, and because its members
are not predisposed to believe climate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, NIPCC
is able to offer an independent “second opinion†of the evidence reviewed – or not reviewed – by the
[UN’s] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the issue of global warming.â€
The study was presented by three of the authors: Dr. Craig D. Idso, Dr. S. Fred Singer and Willie Soon
as well as by Joe Bast, president of The Heartland Institute.
This report should be a standard reference for all policy makers dealing with this generally misrepresented
and misreported issue.
You can get the full report by going to: http://climatechangereconsidered.org/
Contact: Tom Randall
Winningreen LLC
Chicago, IL
Phone: 773-857-5086
e-mail: trandall@winningreen.com
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 15438
- Joined: Thu, Feb 27 2003, 06:38:33 pm
- Location: On the road, USA
-
- Posts: 1265
- Joined: Tue, Aug 04 2009, 12:50:38 pm
- Location: UK
A SSW isn't our fault or Co2 they are driven by our Sun!
29 Feb 2016 - Sudden stratospheric warming describes an event when rapid warming (up to about 50°C in just a couple of days) occurs in the stratosphere.
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&sourc ... k3_ll999tA
29 Feb 2016 - Sudden stratospheric warming describes an event when rapid warming (up to about 50°C in just a couple of days) occurs in the stratosphere.
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&sourc ... k3_ll999tA
John Haig Thompson
<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/mM9Iq7bTjX6da" width="180" height="80" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed"></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/funny-reaction-l ... jX6da">via GIPHY</a></p>
<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/mM9Iq7bTjX6da" width="180" height="80" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed"></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/funny-reaction-l ... jX6da">via GIPHY</a></p>